[Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones
Anne-Karoline Distel
annekadistel at web.de
Wed Feb 21 11:25:39 UTC 2024
Hi,
yes, I think paving_stones is right, but I'm fairly convinced that it
was built wiggly on purpose, otherwise the politician wouldn't have had
a special word for it. I couldn't find anything on wikipedia about the
topic, unfortunately.
Cycling across is not a problem, if you don't mind the sound. I don't
think the whole width of the street is paved wiggly, just enough to let
the water drain, so skaters could use it on the sides.
I wasn't too concerned about the mapping for traffic users of the
street, more for flood prevention analysis, but maybe that's just not
within the scope yet.
Anne
On 21/02/2024 09:50, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> I also would go with surface=paving_stones - and maybe add also
> smoothness tag,
> and agree with Fernando
>
>
> Feb 21, 2024, 01:47 by fernando.trebien at gmail.com:
>
> I think they are surface=paving_stones because:
> - the stones are very flat on top
> - it seems that the objective was to arrange them snugly, although
> the fit may have deteriorated a little
> - it seems pretty easy to ride a bike there, but not skate, which
> is what one generally expects from surface=paving_stones;
> surface=sett is a little more difficult for cycling because the
> stones are less flat and the surface as a whole is also less flat
>
> I think surface=sett is usually more like this:
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.345215550023994&lng=-6.265817519990492&z=19.230259053537715&pKey=516305962724410&focus=photo&x=0.5077006613416395&y=0.5849426144442357&zoom=0
> <https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.345215550023994&lng=-6.265817519990492&z=19.230259053537715&pKey=516305962724410&focus=photo&x=0.5077006613416395&y=0.5849426144442357&zoom=0>
>
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 15:55, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
> That's the best I can do for now:
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.651926666667&lng=-7.2515966666667&z=17&pKey=1685817985195902&focus=photo&x=0.22772882642716127&y=0.968169011381621&zoom=0
> <https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.651926666667&lng=-7.2515966666667&z=17&pKey=1685817985195902&focus=photo&x=0.22772882642716127&y=0.968169011381621&zoom=0>
> You can kind of see the gaps between the stones.
>
> On 17/02/2024 17:46, Åbn wrote:
>> I think you should provide a picture.
>>
>>
>> On February 17, 2024 5:19:06 PM UTC, Anne-Karoline Distel via
>> Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between
>> surface=sett and surface=paved or if what I'm trying to
>> map is covered by either. Where I live, there are some
>> streets that are paved, but the stones aren't set firmly,
>> so they wobble a bit when you drive/ cycle over them. It
>> is perfectly safe, but it allows rainwater to drain
>> quicker, at least I think that is the reason for this
>> type of paving. It sounds a bit like a xylophone (well,
>> lithophone, I guess), when going over them. Considering
>> climate change and the higher likelihood of flooding etc,
>> it would be important to map the difference between paved
>> streets that don't allow for quick drainage and these
>> loosely paved streets. There is probably some technical
>> term for it. So, in short: Do we have a tagging scheme
>> for those or not? Anne
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Tagging mailing list Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> --
> Fernando Trebien
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20240221/35d967c6/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list