[Tagging] Proposal - Median strip

[Manuel B.]

I disagree because a flush median is still a median and I consider `flush_median` to be unnecessarily long, especially with the rule that a single carriageway is typically mapped as one way i.e. it should be a given that the median of a single carriageway is flush (I'd also point out that "divider" is equally misleading since it's intended for painted lines on OSM, not physical barriers — not that there aren't any mappers which have used these for regardless, though). I can, however, change the title to make it clear which type of median I actually mean.

-- Original-Nachricht --
Von: Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com>
Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Proposal - Median strip
Datum: 15.02.2025, 01:57 Uhr
An: Manuel B. <Manuel.Binias at t-online.de>
Cc: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>

"Manuel B." <Manuel.Binias at t-online.de> writes:

> To avoid any sort of confusion out there: I'm specifically talking
> about *flush* medians (one which can easily be repurposed into a
> driving lane), not just the tagging of *any* highway median. Some

Then maybe don't call your proposal or your tag "median"?