[talk-au] [OSM-talk] RFC: Tagging and rendering Australianhighwaynumbers
Brent Easton
b.easton at exemail.com.au
Fri Aug 10 06:41:48 BST 2007
Hi Ian,
need some input from Cameron on what is easiest to parse when rendering. Having some tags with 1 char and some with 2 may require a seperator to make things easier.
Here is another version with your changes
ref:au=NR-1 Highway 1 - (black on white shield)
ref:au=NH-31 National Highway - (yellow on green shield)
ref:au=MR-2 Metroad (blue on white hexagon)
ref:au=S-151 State Route (white on blue shield)
ref:au=T-5 Tourist Route (white on brown Pentagon)
ref:au=A-1 A Roads in states that have them (yellow on green rectangle)
ref:au=B-2 B Roads in states that have them (yellow on green rectangle)
ref:au=C-3 C Roads in states that have them (yellow on green rectangle)
ref:au=M-4 Motorways(yellow on green rectangle)
Is this right that the motorways you are thinking of are part of the Alphanumeric system and appear on a green rectangle? In Sydney, M2, M4, M5 etc. are actually metroad numbers, there are no 'motorways' as such, they are always part of a different tag, either a Metroad in the city, or NR or NH in rural.
Personally, I think we should probaly merge NR and NH and just have H- for Highway. H-1 can be handled as a special case by the renderer and show the white shield instead of green.
It makes sense to me to have A, B, C and M all using their own tags, even though they will all be rendered similiarly (ref:au=AN-B3 for Alphanumeric type, B3 - Yuk).
Multiple references should use ';' eg.
ref:au=T-5;T-6
for a road part where both Tourist drive 5 and 6 run.
Cheers,
Brent.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 10/08/2007 at 3:11 PM Ian Sergeant wrote:
>b.easton at uws.edu.au wrote:
>
>> I would really like to sort out some general Australian specific
>> scheme we can use for tagging now that can potentially be rendered
>> nicely by Cameron, and hopefully eventually on Mapnik and Osmarender.
>
>I like the idea of using ref:au=. That way any non-configured renderer
>(like the default OSM page) will not attempt to render them, and it leaves
>':' as a separator for situations where there are more than one reference
>
>> ref:au=H1 Highway 1 - (black on white shield)
>
>National Route - "NR"
>
>> ref:au=N31 National Highway - (yellow on green shield)
>
>National Highway - "NH"
>
>> ref:au=M2 Metroad (blue on white hexagon)
>
>"MR" for metroad - M means motorway to me.
>
>> ref:au=S151 State Route (white on blue shield)
>> ref:au=T5 Tourist Route (white on brown shield)
>
>brown pentagon.
>
>> ref:au=A1 A Roads in states that have them (white on green
>rectangle?)
>> ref:au=B2 B Roads in states that have them (white on green
>rectangle?)
>> ref:au=C3 C Roads in states that have them (white on green
>rectangle?)
>
>yellow on green oblong.
>
>> Please, rip this proposal to shreds...What have I missed? Are there
>> state variations we need to cater for (ref:au:vic=C2)?
>
>Add Motorway - "M". I don't think we need Freeway - that signage appears
>to have been completely abandoned (although some freeway style roads are
>still signed as state or national highways)
>
>National standards are emerging with alphanumeric naming etc coming into
>play. It would be a shame to have to adopt too many local idiosyncrasies.
>
>---
>http://expressway.paulrands.com/, has a guide to routes. The guys there
>may even help us if we asked nicely, as they look pretty into this sort of
>thing..
>---
>
>Ian.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-au mailing list
>Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.11/944 - Release Date: 9/08/2007 2:44 PM
____________________________________________________________
Brent Easton
Analyst/Programmer
University of Western Sydney
Email: b.easton at uws.edu.au
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list