jim.croft at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 10:02:51 GMT 2008
How about this?
a remoteness index for Australia
You could invent a 'townyness' metric based on the product of the
variables of the settlement's population and its remoteness... :)
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Sam Couter <sam at couter.id.au> wrote:
> Ian Sergeant <isergean at hih.com.au> wrote:
>> Should we tag rural towns and localities as significant centres to
>> accurately reflect their role in the surrounding area, even when they have
>> a low population?
>> + Yes, Some towns have very low population counts, but are very significant
>> administrative and service centres to the surrounding communities. They
>> are a real towns, and not just localities. We should reflect this reality
>> on the map with the place= tag.
> You're asking people to make a subjective judgement here. This will vary
> greatly and cause arguments that can't really be settled.
>> Population data shouldn't be entered at all.. It just extra information to
>> get out of date, and it can be obtained elsewhere. Lets focus on what OSM
>> does best, mapping to reflect the reality on the ground.
> Population count is reality, and it's objective and hard to argue with.
> A compromise may be to note the population in the shire/county rather
> than just within the town itself. This often reflects its importance in
> the region. And of course the renderer may become smart enough to
> consider smaller places more important when they're a long way from
> other places.
> Sam Couter | mailto:sam at couter.id.au
> OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499
"Words, as is well known, are the great foes of reality."
- Joseph Conrad, author (1857-1924)
More information about the Talk-au