[talk-au] secondary_link

[Darrin Smith]

On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:55:56 +1030
Darrin Smith <beldin at beldin.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:20:59 +1030
> Jack Burton <jack at saosce.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:37 +1100, Stuart Robinson wrote:
> > > Links are by default oneway, I think that's what the other person
> > > is getting at.
> > 
> > Ah, I didn't realise that. I don't think most of the ways in
> > question should be oneway, i.e. they allow both turning right from
> > the (dual carriageway) secondary road onto the (single carriageway)
> > tertiary road and vice-versa, but I could well be wrong on that --
> > I'll go and check out a few of them on the ground before changing
> > anything. Thanks for the tip.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> 

Futher on this, is you are going to correct them, please check the
roads you are connecting them to.

I'm seeing examples of valid primary & trunk links being turned into
secondaries and cases of primary cross-link's where I (have now)
correctly labled them as primary instead of primary_link being changed
into secondaries whilst the main road remains primary.

-- 

=b