[talk-au] navit

[Ben Kelley]

I think the latter.

- Ben.

-----Original Message-----
From: b.schulz.10 at scu.edu.au
Sent: 07 August 2009 13:33
To: talk-au at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] navit

I wonder, how hard would it be to write a script which looked at the ABS boundaries and placed an is_in= tag on every way/node/whatever which is completely within the multipolygon relation?

Or would it be better to modify the routing software to look at the ABS boundaries instead?

Just throwing ideas around

Brent

----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Couter <sam at couter.id.au>
Date: Friday, August 7, 2009 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: [talk-au] navit
To: talk-au at openstreetmap.org

> John Smith <delta_foxtrot at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Nothing special, just followed the directions on this wiki page:
> > 
> > 
> http://www.rigacci.org/wiki/doku.php/doc/appunti/hardware/eeepc_navit
> As a result, most of the towns and suburbs in Australia can't be
> searched for due to a lack of is_in tags. My patch for osm2navit
> (attached) is a bit heavy-handed but trivial. If you've got a build
> environment set up for navit, give it a go.
> -- 
> Sam Couter         
> |  mailto:sam at couter.id.au
> OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 
> 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20090807/afff9ab2/attachment.html>