[talk-au] Cycleway/footway/path

[John Smith]

--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Gah... don't tag for the renderer.

We're not tagging for the renderer, we're tagging to describe something, perhaps this is just a case of needing a width and to render accordingly, however you need something more than just highway=path to describe what is currently being described.

> What is it about the path that makes it better for cycling
> in your opinion?

I don't cycle much so it isn't going to do much for me either way, but the previous poster had a point about showing paths that were more for bike riders because they were wider.