[talk-au] Sports Clubs

[John Smith]

2009/12/15 Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com>:
> Well, "complexity" is subjective here, so sorry if it seems I'm
> exaggerating in this situation. But the point I'm making is that,
> rather than inventing a new tag to encapsulate, e.g. "buildings that
> are...a restaurant, bar, and gambling location [and] are members

These buildings are a particular type of location, they are unique in
a category of there own, even if they do share features with other
establishments that are currently tagged.

> only", i.e. "buildings that are A, B, C and D", I personally think
> tagging A, B, C and D is a more powerful solution, for reasons I've
> already described. Just an idea - I'm happy to be proven wrong.

But you left out important option G!