[talk-au] Tagging fuel locations

[John Smith]

2009/12/21 Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com>:
> 1) Obviously, use what's already documented/in use where possible -
> e.g. atm=yes is established, so use it instead of amenity:atm=yes

See below...

> 2) If it can only reasonably be interpreted as an amenity, I don't
> think you need to use an "amenity:" prefix - it's redundant, right? Is
> there any consensus on how to tag when you want to tag X=Y + X=Z? Is
> using X:Y=yes + X:Z=yes best-practice, or just Y=yes + Z=yes? Maybe
> this is worth starting a new thread on...
> 3) Regardless though, as I said, make sure "it's documented and the
> tags are explicit in their meaning" - then you can't go wrong

I assumed, perhaps incorrectly in hindsight, that to combine them
would make more sense, rather than stripping off the part of it
*shrug*

> Sorry I don't have time right now to do a bunch of wiki searching to
> give you more specific answers. Maybe let me know if there's any
> particular tags you're not sure about?
>

Well the data is already in the DB, so once we figure out what to
change them to we can just bulk update them.