[talk-au] How to tag a non-existent road
evan at sebire.org
Mon Oct 26 07:04:08 GMT 2009
I had thought the main reason for the non-existent tag was when importing data
from government sources. If OSM ever get a licensed copy of the vic data (
http://www.land.vic.gov.au ) similar to the data google used this tag would be
very useful. This is the main reason no-one uses google/Sensis(UBD) maps in
Melbourne, they are crap because they include all the non-existent roads.
This database keeps track of land uses, not if it is actually exists.
If this data was to be regularly imported (every 6 months) it would be useful
to know the non-existent roads so they are not re-established.
This tag could be quite useful in the future, and to have everyone using the
same tag for non-existent roads is useful. Currently there are tags in the
map that I have no-idea why they exist. Non-existent being documented is a
On Monday 26 Oct 2009 03:57:04 swanilli wrote:
> 2009/10/26 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>
> > So far you are the only one suggesting non-existent is unhelpful or
> > ambiguous, please explain how it is either of these things.
> A browse through the preceding 30 or so entries in this thread will show
> that this is not the case.
> However, in an attempt to move this towards resolution, I have opened
> another to give people the opportunity to vote on the specifics.
More information about the Talk-au