[talk-au] ODBL yet again, but from a pragmatic approach...

[John Smith]

Since I've heard nothing more about this I can only assume that any
consideration for a compromise has been rejected by the pro-PD crowd.

On 30 July 2010 15:54, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 July 2010 15:40, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was going to just create a new account, and not agree to the CTs,
>> only to discover you cannot create an account without accepting. That
>> means that no new members can contribute by deriving information from
>> Nearmap imagery...
>>
>
> I've cc'd Grant on this email, he posted to the #osm-au IRC channel
> about some proposed changes to the CTs, which I was hoping would have
> come up in another thread by now:
>
> "LWG is considering:
>
> 3. OSMF agrees to use or sub-license Your Contents as part of a
> database and only under the terms of one of the following licenses:
> the Open Database Licence for the database and Database Contents
> Licence for the individual contents of the database; or the Creative
> Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence (version 2.0 or later)
>
> If You have indicated to OSMF that you waive any rights in Your
> Contents (dedication to the 'public domain'), OSMF will additionally
> use or sub-license Your Contents under: the Public Domain Dedication &
> License; or the Creative Commons CC0 waiver."
>