[talk-au] Hiking tracks: foot=yes or foot=designated?
snowgum at gmx.com
Sun Feb 28 03:04:33 GMT 2010
Steve Bennett wrote:
> Have we reached the point where we start making inflammatory straw-man
> arguments rather than working together to reach a sensible conclusion?
> I hope not. I'll continue in good faith...
> Do you agree that a useful map is one that contains "enough"
> information but not "too much"? The Lonvia map, at the zoom level I
> pasted (ie, all of Victoria, and some of NSW and SA) would, under your
> scheme, show a grand total of exactly two trails. Any view of NT, SA,
> WA on Tasmania would show zero. QLD would show one. IMHO, this is too
And I disagree. Having registered my disagreement, can we please leave
it at that?
More information about the Talk-au