[talk-au] access=destination

[John Smith]

2010/1/16 Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com>:
> The main issue that access=destination (i.e. applying to all traffic
> modes) is wrong - it isn't on the ground, and (quite probably...)
> isn't even in the legal books.

I haven't seen any signs that distinguish between traffic, they just
state "Local Traffic Only" anything else would have to be defined in
law, so we are mapping what's on the ground, what isn't on the ground
is what the sign means legally.

> [something]=destination. Or are you saying we should ignore these
> signs altogether?

We're tagging what the sign states, what it means will vary between
legal jurisdictions...