[talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-talk] That license change link

[Liz]

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
> But to get back to the point of your question about the percentage
> required for changeover.  Do you have a preference or suggestion for
> percentage of contributors and or percentage of data that would be
> right for the changeover?

I find the notion of voting for or against a changeover without these targets 
being defined quite wrong.
Part of voting for a change involves knowledge of the whole process, and we 
are still not sure if this part of the process has even been determined - any 
requests for this information have met with a blank.

When I attend a meeting, I know that the quorum is so many of the delegates.
When I vote for a parliamentary representative I know how many votes are 
needed as a percentage for a candidate to be elected.
The rules are set, then we vote.
We don't vote and then determine what percent of the vote is needed to pass 
the motion.