[talk-au] ODBL yet again, but from a pragmatic approach...
deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 11 00:56:38 BST 2010
On 11 July 2010 09:50, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> I presume that you refer to paragraph three of the contributor terms
> "3. OSMF agrees to use or sub-license Your Contents as part of a
> database and only under the terms of one of the following licenses:
> ODbL 1.0 for the database and DbCL 1.0 for the individual contents of
> the database; CC-BY-SA 2.0; or another free and open license. Which
> other free and open license is chosen by a vote of the OSMF membership
> and approved by at least a 2/3 majority vote of active contributors. "
> Which states clearly that it requires consent of the OSM foundation
> board and of 2/3 majority of current OSM contributors.
More information about the Talk-au