[talk-au] Defining critical mass...

[John Smith]

There has been a slightly disturbing thread on the legal-talk list
about defining critical mass, so far things aren't any closer to being
defined and statistics are being abused to suit positions:

http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-July/003453.html

At this stage I'll not be agreeing to ODBL, not because I disagree
with the license, but because I disagree with the process being used.
Without some better criteria being employed to make the process less
subjective and prone to personal bias it will be as 80n put it, a
simple wait game until things go their way, I don't think this is the
right thing to do, it's a kind of sleazy politicking tactic to achieve
an unfavourable result desired by a minority...