[talk-au] A proposal to change Botany Bay into a relation

[Andrew Harvey]

Okay, I've just moved the bay tags to multipolygon, and added that
small way that closes Bare Island to the multipolygon. I've left the
ABS tags on the outer way, because that is what they are attributing,
the location of the nodes on that way. The fact that the outer way
forms Botany Bay I know from local_knowledge, hence I don't see why
the mulitpolygon should be attributed to ABS.

I also just added the straight coastline that crosses the entrance to the bay.

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Markus_g <markus_g at bigpond.com> wrote:
> Almost.
>
> 1) Bare Island isn't a closed way. But that can be easily fixed.
> 2) Remove the tags from the outer way of Botany Bay and label the
> multipolygon with name=Botany Bay natural=bay attribution=ABS
>
> Regards,
>
> Markus_g
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: talk-au-bounces at openstreetmap.org
> [mailto:talk-au-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Harvey
> Sent: Sunday, 10 October 2010 9:57 PM
> To: OSM Australian Talk List
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] A proposal to change Botany Bay into a relation
>
> I've made the revisions,
> http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~amha119/botany-bay-relation2.osm
>
> So I've used the multipolygon to make islands as inner, and left the
> other bays are separate bays. After I get this working I can then try
> to turn Congwong Bay at the East into an area, and then it can be
> debated if that is separate, or part of Botany Bay.
>
> I'll upload this one tomorrow if there are no further objections or
> suggestions.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
>
>