edodd at billiau.net
Thu Apr 7 11:50:33 BST 2011
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:19:39 +0100
Grant Slater <openstreetmap at firefishy.com> wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 06:58, Ian Sergeant <inas66+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7 April 2011 12:57, David Murn <davey at incanberra.com.au> wrote:
> >> If the Australian issue is so important, as others have suggested
> >> why isnt OSMF seeking to make a rapid agreement with NearMap as
> >> was done with Bing?
> > This really needs to be done.
> > Is wonder if this is just due to a shortage of time that the LWG
> > hasn't included this as yet?
> Absolutely and it is a important to LWG too. We have had discussions
> with NearMap in the past. Last discussion with NearMap was passing the
> revised Contributor Terms 1.2.4 to NearMap for their legal review, we
> are currently waiting on them.
> LWG Member.
Grant, that sounds like
"here are the terms, take it or shove it"
you may or may not understand the vernacular, we will
but I don't see any evidence of cooperatively trying to reach a
More information about the Talk-au