[talk-au] Wiki + Data Sources + Licensing Categories

[John Smith]

On 8 April 2011 09:28, Ian Sergeant <inas66+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> If the data owner doesn't grant permission under an acceptable licence
> then we shouldn't relying on one interpretation of very recent
> Australian case.  Especially since there are other areas of law that
> may come into play here.

Actually the court case was a few years ago I think, this was an
appeal against the earlier ruling.

> Keeping OSM data clean is the priority.

It's a pity those pushing for the current license change aren't so
adamant, it seems to me they haven't put enough effort into informing
people about the full ramifications of the CTs.