[talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-dev] To OSM editor authors ...

[John Smith]

On 8 April 2011 10:06, Ben Last <ben.last at nearmap.com> wrote:
>
> To be clear; we're not "refusing" anything - our licence has remained the same since we launched, and we haven't changed it.  The new OSM CTs are incompatible with it.

Several people have made similar comments, they looked into the
license OSM-F was publishing their work under and was happy that it
was strong copyleft, and that is the only reason they submitted
contributions to OSM-F, otherwise we might as well all be working for
google for free, especially since they have better aerial imagery than
Bing and yahoo etc...