[talk-au] Re-entering data to avoid licensing failure
lkernan at gmail.com
Sun Dec 18 09:55:41 GMT 2011
For those interested in when and how the maxspeed change was done, here's a
couple of changesets to start looking at (and i'm sure there are others
around the same time)
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Ben Kelley <ben.kelley at gmail.com> wrote:
> The maxspeed change was applied to all highway=residential ways with no
> maxspeed afaik.
> It was not done with a not account.
> This was some months ago now.
> - Ben.
> Ben Kelley
> On Dec 18, 2011 1:48 PM, "Richard Weait" <richard at weait.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Sam Wilson <sam at archives.org.au> wrote:
>> > Thanks Richard and Steve for your ideas. I've started using the licence
>> > check plugin... and now getting disheartened at the extent of the
>> > non-agreeing data! :-(
>> > Ah well. I rather want to keep mapping, and not wait till this is all
>> > resolved... so I think I shall just fix (as in, recreate) those ways
>> with a
>> > v1 decliner, and ignore the rest for the time being. Seems silly to be
>> > manually removing every "maxspeed=50" anyway; that's the sort of thing
>> > machine will do when the time comes.
>> Did the maxspeed bot use a bot account, or the bot tag on changesets?
>> Do you (collectively or individually) have an analysis of the maxspeed
>> bot changes? Are those the only aspects tainting a large number of
>> How would you feel about running a repair bot?
>> Best regards,
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-au