[talk-au] I deleted a few locality boundaries...

[Ian Sergeant]

On 19 December 2011 11:50, Ross Scanlon <info at 4x4falcon.com> wrote:


> As I said and it's been said many times before other items should not be
> attached to boundaries.
>

If a boundary IS a coastline, sharing a way isn't wrong.  Would you really
create two ways that are fully coincident?

There is details on the wiki about separating the rivers etc from the
> boundaries.  Look under Australian Tagging Guidelines.
>

I'm sure I could find another wiki page which says the opposite.  The
sharing object debate is as old as OSM.

As for the relevance to ABS import - if a river location is derived from
non-CT data, it should be deleted as it is derived from a work that hasn't
been relicenced.  This applies whether the river and the boundary share an
object or not - makes no difference.

Ian.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20111219/8aa1a750/attachment.html>