[talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

[John Smith]

On 8 July 2011 14:06, SteveC <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> Actually, the license process has been known about for a long, long time so it's not this new turnaround you cast it as. In addition, everyone else (bing, ordnance survey...) has worked with us very reasonably. In fact it's hard to say near map have been unreasonable, just that they were not quite as happy as all our other contributors of similar data.

Was the OS given all pertinent facts about ODBL and how it doesn't
require a minimum level of attribution on produced works?

AFAIK OS requires attribution and ODBL doesn't require it down stream.
This is a big show stopped for most government agencies I've heard
about in Australia.