[talk-au] rationalising administrative boundaries

[John Smith]

On 15 June 2011 12:16, Gary Gallagher <g.null.device at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been working on my suburb (Brunswick East), and keep coming across
> tangled messes of ways caused by the boundary data effectively floating
> above different ways. Roads are being connected to the boundary instead
> of the the road. The road or other way has been moved to create a clear
> path for the boundary and vice-a-versa. I presume the overlapping
> sections of the boundary could be merged with the underlying way. Has
> anybody had any experience doing this and what are the potential
> pitfalls?

The current boundaries will be removed in the near future, so if I
were you I wouldn't spend to much time fussing over them.