[talk-au] rationalising administrative boundaries

[John Smith]

On 16 June 2011 15:01, Gary Gallagher <g.null.device at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments, I think I'll hold off. It does seem
> unfortunate that there is no basic work-flow to convert a boundary into
> a relation containing the ways that make it up. From what you've said
> Nick merging nodes still keeps them as separate ways just stacked on top
> of each other - which is what I'm trying to avoid.

The boundaries should already be relations, but people tend to break
them frequently.