[talk-au] ODBL and real life...
John Smith
deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 19 16:00:08 BST 2011
On 20 June 2011 00:55, Grant Slater <openstreetmap at firefishy.com> wrote:
> If however on the other hand if someone created an SVG file specially
> for the purpose of extracted OSM data and tags, it would be extremely
> difficult for them to argue that is a produced work and not a
> database.
That's assuming a single party acting on bad faith, 2 independent
parties operating independently would be able to claim otherwise.
> There is a simple guideline on the wiki: (from 2009)
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Produced_Work_-_Guideline
>
>> In other words CC-by-SA protects data better than ODBL.
>>
>
> No. See above.
You are assuming that a single party or both parties involved are
operating under bad faith, in all likelihood there could be a range of
places to source data from, even OSM.org for that matter, with a
secondary party operating in the US.
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list