[talk-au] rationalising administrative boundaries

[Grant Slater]

On 15 June 2011 06:15, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 12:16, Gary Gallagher <g.null.device at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been working on my suburb (Brunswick East), and keep coming across
>> tangled messes of ways caused by the boundary data effectively floating
>> above different ways. Roads are being connected to the boundary instead
>> of the the road. The road or other way has been moved to create a clear
>> path for the boundary and vice-a-versa. I presume the overlapping
>> sections of the boundary could be merged with the underlying way. Has
>> anybody had any experience doing this and what are the potential
>> pitfalls?
>
> The current boundaries will be removed in the near future, so if I
> were you I wouldn't spend to much time fussing over them.
>

Not true.

/ Grant