[talk-au] ODBL and real life...

[Anthony]

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2011 7:17 PM, "Grant Slater" <openstreetmap at firefishy.com> wrote:
>> *: Correct me if I am wrong, but the GPL also doesn't have a
>> restrictive 'no reverse engineering' clause.
> The GPL isn't sold as a license which restricts the use of factual
> information obtained from reverse engineering.

LGPL would be a better analogy anyway, and it is clear that LGPL
derivatives cannot be released under a less restrictive license, only
under a more restrictive one.