sam at couter.id.au
Fri Nov 4 11:50:23 GMT 2011
Nick Hocking <nick.hocking at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've got to disagree here. In my opinoion, Liz and John S (and a couple of
> others) have, for quite awhile now had a clear agenda of just trying to damage
> OSM as much as humanly possible.
Disagreement with what's currently being done or with what is proposed
is not the same as trying to destroy the project.
> On this basis, I believe that the best thing would be for there to be no posts
> from these people on these lists.
Stifling dissent so you only hear agreeable opinons might make you feel
good but it's counter-productive. The productive approach is to actually
address the issues and dissenting opinions. Yes it's more difficult that
way, but it's the only way to improve.
Sam Couter | mailto:sam at couter.id.au
OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Talk-au