[talk-au] Princes Highway (Relation 538443)
richard at weait.com
Wed Sep 7 03:54:05 BST 2011
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Ian Sergeant <inas66+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
[regarding a relation with gaps]
> I have surveyed, it is removed from the relation, and consequently the
> relation has a gap.
> My understanding is for this relation type - a route - gaps are not
> allowed. After all, this is the whole point of having a "route" isn't it?
Route relations may have gaps. A route relation may have gaps because
it is not yet complete on the ground, because it is not complete in
OSM, or because the route in fact has gaps.
More information about the Talk-au