[talk-au] RMS (NSW)'s Bicycle infrastructure map in beta ( http://www.bicycleinfo.nsw.gov.au/maps/cycleways.html )
ben.kelley at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 00:50:06 BST 2012
I had a quick look at it this morning, and it seems a bit inaccurate in
areas where I know OSM is good. (Ashfield, Marrickville, Burwood)
Essentially routes marked on the map that are not cycle routes and actual
cycle routes missing.
That said, there are probably places where it lists real cycle routes that
OSM does not have, but possibly it is no more useful than council maps in
this regard. Either way you need to survey, but proving that something
isn't a cycle route tends to be more time consuming than proving something
On Aug 20, 2012 9:06 AM, "Ian Sergeant" <inas66+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> I'm sure we can do better.
> I was following apmon's remapping idea on the weekend, and for each
> suburb pair in Sydney produced a travel distance for car routing
> (using all motor vehicle accessible roads) and a "quiet cycle" routing
> (using only highway=residential|cycleway, cycleway=*, lcn=*, rcn=*),
> then sorted the resulting grid in terms of % difference.
> I'm yet to come to terms with exactly what the numbers mean (if
> anything :-), but I think there are certainly some pointers to further
> urban exploration in there.
> On 18 August 2012 11:17, Sam Russell <g.samuelrussell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > RMS is now supplying an "infrastructure" map with all of the usual fun
> > follies: http://www.bicycleinfo.nsw.gov.au/maps/cycleways.html
> > All of the usual wonder and enjoyment of dealing with the RMS on bicycle
> > related issues, now in one map!
> > thanks,
> > Sam.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-au