[talk-au] import of state borders?
inas66+osm at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 00:47:52 BST 2012
It looks like we've finished the NSW/Victoria border. There are
probably a couple of bits I'll go back to and touch up, but otherwise
So, what's next to complete the national/state borders?
On 27 August 2012 18:10, Michael Krämer <ohrosm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/8/27 Ian Sergeant <inas66+osm at gmail.com>
>> The first real divergence I've come across is here, where the ABS
>> border follows the northern anabranch, but it seems clear from AGRI
>> that the southern watercourse is now the one with the most flow. I'd
>> like to declare this land as part of NSW.
> Sounds reasonable to me.
> In fact I also came across the first cut-offs over the weekend, an example
> is . But I found it rather difficult to decide for one state or the
> other. According to  (page 2) the border does not necessarily change if
> the river does: "The creation of a new channel after 1850 by sudden avulsion
> will not alter the location of the state border. [...] The rule of gradual
> and imperceptible erosion and accretion will apply." So I let Victoria win
> there, even though I don't have any data from 1850 available....
> Best regards,
More information about the Talk-au