[talk-au] 4WD only tags
Li Xia
lisxia1982 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 12:32:59 GMT 2012
Hi David,
Just scanned your personal page quickly while i had spare time so sorry up front if i missed anything.
A quick comment on the proposed grading. According to your proposal of tagging grades 6-8, what happens when a track is tagged with 4wd_only=yes and grade=6?
Li.
On 06/11/2012, at 2:23 PM, David Bannon wrote:
>
> OK Li, you ask and you shall receive !
>
> Here
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Davo#Draft_4x4_road_proposal
> is my very early draft. You and everyone else is welcome to get stuck
> into it, I am not thin skinned !
>
> The OSM proposal page says to to be verbose, no one need tell me to be
> verbose ! So if its too long, please indicate what needs removing. And
> obviously, error and omissions ....
>
> I am quite unhappy that it really ends up undercutting the 4wd_only tag,
> they can coexist but I wonder if they will if this is successful. Its a
> shame really, I like 4wd_only and have used it but as I developed my
> arguments it became clear to me that we need a finer grain and its
> probably easier to add levels to tracktype than it is to 4wd_only. And
> it will be easier to get these levels rendered if we go for tracktype.
>
> David
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 17:28 +1100, Li Xia wrote:
>> No probs david, and you'll be getting plenty of input from me, watch
>> out ;-)
>>
>>
>> A draft would be great. Let me know when it's ready to review.
>>
>>
>> Li.
>>
>> On 05/11/2012, at 9:10 AM, David Bannon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Li, I have not put that proposal up yet, waiting on a
>>> response to a related matter. Soon.
>>>
>>> And when I do, I'll not be wanting just your vote, it will be your
>>> input I will really need !
>>>
>>> Maybe I should put a draft up on my personal page while we wait ?
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From:
>>> "Li Xia" <lisxia1982 at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> To:
>>> "David Bannon" <dbannon at internode.on.net>
>>> Cc:
>>> "OSM Australian Talk List" <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
>>> Sent:
>>> Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:37:52 +1100
>>> Subject:
>>> Re: 4WD only tags
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi David, although my opinion is that most render's try to
>>> simplify the the stylesheet so the map for ease of
>>> comprehension and would not make use of these additional
>>> attributes, I see your point and agree that it's useful data
>>> to have. Since my company focuses on 4WD maps and
>>> navigation, we will certainly take full advantage of this.
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, do you have the link to the proposal page? Will go and
>>> cast a vote.
>>>
>>>
>>> Li.
>>>
>>> On 04/11/2012, at 2:41 PM, David Bannon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Li, I beg to differ. While I agree that grading of a
>>> 4x4 track is subjective, so is much of the other
>>> data in the OSM database. Must be that way.
>>>
>>> The real issue is how important the data is. As I
>>> have mentioned, I am concerned that maps are being
>>> rendered that ignore this data. Routing engines are
>>> potentially sending people down roads that they, and
>>> their vehicles are ill suited to. Bad things will
>>> definitely happen.
>>>
>>> The routing people are saying "but these tags don't
>>> even show on the OSM maps, why should we worry ?".
>>>
>>> And as to subjective, while there will always be
>>> borderline cases, I don't think it would be too hard
>>> to divide tracks up into -
>>>
>>> * 4x4 recommended - you will might be OK in a
>>> conventional car or (better still) an SUV but you
>>> have been warned.
>>>
>>> * 4x4 required - you really need a stock 4x4, a real
>>> one with (eg) low ratio.
>>>
>>> * 4x4 extreme - this is for the death or glory boys,
>>> they need experience and modified vehicles. This is
>>> a recent addition !
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure that if you and I spent a couple of
>>> weeks having some driving fun, we'd agree on the
>>> vast majority of the tracks we graded.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From:
>>> "Li Xia" <lisxia1982 at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> To:
>>> "David Bannon" <dbannon at internode.on.net>
>>> Cc:
>>> "OSM Australian Talk List"
>>> <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
>>> Sent:
>>> Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:08:22 +1100
>>> Subject:
>>> 4WD only tags
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi David, just my 2 cents on 4WD_only tags.
>>>
>>> By adding a 4x4 recommended tag will add to
>>> the complexity because it's kind of
>>> subjective as to which roads/tracks are
>>> traversable in a 2WD vehicle, therefor
>>> adding another option for this key will
>>> further complicate the issue.
>>>
>>> Li.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list