[talk-au] Vicmap licensing

[Daniel O'Connor]

Also: clarify  explicitly that attribution in the wiki is acceptable to
them.
On 17/09/2013 6:43 PM, "Daniel O'Connor" <daniel.oconnor at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would send them the odbl licence and position it as 'is this ok with
> your open government stance? '
>
> neatly avoids cc by confusion, gives them an attitude to address,  and
> likely ends up with 'let it be free'
> On 17/09/2013 4:53 PM, "Li Xia" <lisxia1982 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gday everyone,
>>
>> I've been talking to DSE about importing vicmap data into OSM under the
>> CC license. Got this reply today...
>>
>> "The Creative Commons licence requires you to Attribute the work/data as
>> being Vicmap Data. We would like to sit down with you at some stage in
>> early October and discuss the inclusion of Vicmap into OSM.?
>>
>> I'm not a legal buff, but if someone is, would you like to join me for
>> this meeting?
>>
>> Li.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20130917/c0764bbb/attachment.html>