[talk-au] NSW LPI licencing framework review [Was: Wither Sydney suburb boundaries?]

[Ross Scanlon]

I'd also suggest getting address data, similar to the vicmap data, and 
released as cc-by-sa

Cheers
Ross


On 01/05/14 10:20, Michael Gratton wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 1 May, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ian Sergeant <inas66 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that if and when we can use the definitive suburb boundaries
>> we should use their line.
>> The ABS data just doesn't have the accuracy for that in my
>> experience.  I think you'll generally find in cases like this that the
>> actual boundary is the property line.
>> So fingers crossed for positive response from LPI!
>
> Indeed. Speaking of which, the LPI would like submissions from us!
>
> After my email enquiry a few weeks ago, I received this back from the LPI:
>
>> I have been informed by management that LPI is currently reviewing the
>> licencing framework and will be in a better position to answer your
>> query within the next 4 to 6 weeks.
>
> We can send submissions for the review to Greg Windsor
> greg.windsor at lpi.nsw.gov.au, so this might be a good chance to make some
> polite, positive suggestions and argue the case for releasing (at least)
> data like suburb boundaries under a licence suitable for inclusion in OSM.
>
>
> //Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au