[talk-au] (no subject)

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Dec 13 11:44:55 UTC 2015


I have left a comment on his last change set .. suggesting not to reduce detail.

And that the new LPI information is good for park boundaries too.


On 13/12/2015 8:23 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know.
>
> I checked out one particular changeset, 35907472, looking at the
> geometry changes at
> http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=35907472.
>
> It appears like there is some missing data which they have added
> (which is great).
>
> But it also appears that they have removed finer details (which seem
> legitimate when comparing against the aerial imagery) of other
> existing geometry (which is bad, and in my opinion we need to revert
> back).
>
> I don't know what we should do about this since some parts of the
> changeset appear to be constructive some appear slightly destructive
> (no loss of features, just some slight loss of detail).
>
> On 13 December 2015 at 18:24, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> It seems like some Australian mapper (stweb) [1] is reaching out for
>> help on the forum [2]. One of his complaints is the number of nodes
>> used to trace lakes, beaches, etc. He did several "simplifications" in
>> his last changesets [3]. I don't know how the Australian community
>> thinks about this.
>>
>> Perhaps it is worthwhile to reach out to him.
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>> m
>> (from Belgium)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stweb
>> [2] http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=566043#p566043
>> [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stweb/history#map=6/-33.591/151.597
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




More information about the Talk-au mailing list