[talk-au] Residential/commercial property boundaries
mike at vee.net
Sun Jan 3 10:26:01 UTC 2016
Yes, as I said landuse doesn't seem to be what I'm after here.
What was the objection to fine grained land ownership in OSM? Seems
like a particularly useful thing to have in. Is it just "imports suck"?
⊨ Michael Gratton, Percept Wrangler.
On Sun, 3 Jan, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> The Karlsruher Schema is intended for postal addresses, typically the
> tags are used on building outlines or on nodes. I wouldn't use them on
> landuse boundaries. Nor would I import fine grained land ownership in
> the first place (you should be able to find discussion of the pros and
> cons on the talk or talk-us mailings lists some time back.
> Am 03.01.2016 um 07:29 schrieb Michael Gratton:
>> Hey all,
>> Now that the NSW LPI goldmine is available, I'd like to be able to
>> individual residential and commercial property boundaries. Looking
>> the wiki, it seems like boundary=administrative isn't applicable and
>> landuse=... is for larger areas, so is the only useful tagging
>> something like:
>> But then Karlsruhe says that buildings should be tagged with the
>> addr:* tags instead?
>> Any suggestions?
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-au