[talk-au] Competing relations - similar areas.

[cleary]

I don't recall that particular edit but I recall some edits of
administrative boundaries, including national parks and state forests
where I was trying to disentangle landcover from the administrative
boundaries, but I tried to leave the landcover or natural=wood areas as
closely as I could to what I had found.  I agree that landuse=forest
should be for commercial forest land use (including state forests)  but
should therefore not be used for national parks.   If I've made any
errors, please correct them  - now and any other instance. Thanks.
 
 
 
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 09:32 AM, Warin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have noticed there are two relations with similar areas and both
> tagged landuse=forest. Relation 5929494 created by down12under
> changeset 37053382 2/7/16 source given as 'aerial imagery', later
> edited by cleary and TheSwavu.
>
> Relation 5929493 created by down12under changeset 36918772 2/1/16
> source given as 'aerial imagery', later edited by cleary.
>
> _Amalgamation_  Looking closely .. for example way 396488797 is used
> in both relations! So as far as I can see these, in part, are
> duplicates.
>
> I think these should be amalgamated into one relation. The outers of
> this relation should use the greater area of the two original
> relations. The inners of this relation should use all inners of the
> two relations combining where required.
>
> Where there is doubt, bing imagery could be used to resolve and
> issues.
>
> _Tags_  The source tag could be applied with "source=by down12under
> using 'aerial imagery later modifications using Bing imagery or as
> note on the individual way"?
>
> As the areas cover, in part, designated national park/s the tag could
> be changed to natural=wood as landuse=forest implies the commercial
> use of the forest (land use). Aerial or satellite imagery only tells
> us land cover not land use so I think natural=wood is a better match.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20160725/8793c144/attachment.html>