[talk-au] A possible CAPAD 2016 import?
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 10:48:30 UTC 2017
On 17-Feb-17 09:04 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> The good folks at DoEE have been more helpful and have given us
> permission to use future releases of CAPAD under the same terms. Given
> that the next release of CAPAD is due out in a number of weeks it
> raises the question should we wait and then do an import?
Wait.
For those like me lost with the acronyms
DoEE, Commonwealth Department of Environment and Energy
CAPAD, Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database
>
> Assuming that the community thinks this is a good idea the other big
> question is what to do with the existing boundaries. Having a look at
> the data it appears that the data we have permission to use is:
>
> 1. NSW from NSW LPI (but these are only the areas managed by the NSW
> NPWS)
>
> 2. Tas from CAPAD 2014
>
> 3. SA from DEWNR
>
> All of the other data is from unknown sources or sources we don't have
> permission to use (or at least I can't find it on the wiki).
>
> So do we:
>
> 1. Scrub them off and start again,
> 2. Scrub off the other tags and leave them if they have a landcover
> tag, or
> 3. Try and reuse them with the replace geometry tool?
>
> Other ideas?
My thoughts ... initial .. subject to improvements?
A)
Data should not be removed from OSM base on a suspicion.
If you believe something comes from a copyright source then take it up
with the contributor on an individual basis. If you don't want to do
this .. then don't remove the data either.
B)
The NSW LPI data I would leave alone for now.
Work on those states that are not well defined or poorly represented in
OSM.
I would compare the present data in OSM with the CAPAD data .. if it is
the same then add the tag checked=CAPAD yyyy ? (where yyyy = numerical year)
If it is different then use the replace geometry tool and then alter the
source tag..
If new .. then just add it as usual.
C)
Has the appropriate OSM permission for this import been obtained? It has
been for past CAPAD .. but may need to be verified for 2016? Should be a
simple thing?
Possibly the permission needs to be open ended like the DoEE permission
to use it?
----------------------------
I note that the DoEE are using OSM mapping ... through mapbox.
see map on
https://data.gov.au/dataset/collaborative-australian-protected-areas-database-capad-2010-external12
--------------------
Some OSM links
2014 import of CAPAD
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Collaborative_Australian_Protected_Areas_Database_(CAPAD)
Permission to use CAPAD (starts sequentially from the top earliest and
to the bottom latest)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20170217/8c1dfb5e/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list