[talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 134, Issue 8

Adam Roberts adamben.roberts at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 12:29:29 UTC 2018


Thanks Andrew. I'm working with the Targomo API (https://www.targomo.com),
which does consider sidewalk tags, if present.

I won't be removing the already mapped footways. You are correct -
shouldn't interfere.

Cheers,
Adam



Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:17:04 +1000
> From: Andrew Davidson <theswavu at gmail.com>
> To: talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Pedestrian/bike access near Wiley Park
> Message-ID: <87f43a36-40c9-c0f4-9007-283509bacad2 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 15/8/18 02:18, Adam Roberts wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> > I'm experiencing some routing difficulties for ped/bike near the Wiley
> Park
> > station, and looking for some tagging and digitizing advice.
>
> Just out of interest: which router are you using? I haven't been able to
> find one that consumes the sidewalk tag.
>
> > Sidewalk tags seems the most straightforward, as I won't
> > need to connect each sidewalk via crosswalks, but that would likely
> involve
> > removing the mapped sidewalks south of The Boulevarde, and replacing as
> > tags. Would that be ok?
>
> Not really.
>
> Is there any reason why you can't combine both mapping schemes? All that
> sidewalk=left means is that somewhere to the left of this way there is a
> footway/cycleway. If you also map that footway/cycleway then the tag is
> still correct. I don't see why you would have to delete the
> footway/cycleway.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20180816/d72187e2/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list