[talk-au] Using data from traditional owners of the land / Current waiver form

[Luke Picciau]

Intentionally not mapping a path in public space seems unsafe. What if someone gets lost on this trail and needs to find the way back?


On 24 August 2018 6:48:18 am ACST, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 20:38, Ewen Hill <ewen.hill at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> It's an interesting conundrum that perhaps going forward we need to
>flag
>> how
>> we deal with sacred areas and knowledge that should be respected by
>not
>> being mapped.
>>
>
>But the Trail itself is open for anybody to walk along, isn't it?
>
>So there's nothing stopping an enthusiastic OSM'er from walking it with
>their GPS, then innocently mapping it, without knowing that that is
>against
>the wishes of the local community.
>
>Maybe we need some sort of "Do not map" protection for sensitive areas
>so
>we can draw a box over the length of the Trail & "10" (?) km either
>side,
>so that nothing can be inserted in there? Could be set-up either as a
>visible greyed out area on the map, or as an area that you just can't
>edit
>- feasible?
>
>Thanks
>
>Graeme


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20180824/b96e7559/attachment.html>