[talk-au] network=Translink SEQ vs network=TransLink SEQ

osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au
Tue Jul 10 22:35:57 UTC 2018

With all 7700 objects (both network variants) loaded, I also noticed that there is some variation in the operator tag (excuse the screenshot):



Which could probably be cleaned up at the same time if we agree on which ones are the correct ones.


From: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2018 08:07
To: osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] network=Translink SEQ vs network=TransLink SEQ


On 11 July 2018 at 06:14, <osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.talk-au at thorsten.engler.id.au> > wrote:

I’ve just noticed that there are 3-4k of both network=Translink SEQ and network=TransLink SEQ


Given that tag values are generally considered case sensitive, shouldn’t these two be conflated into one or the other?


Yes, they probably should be.


I've just checked & the name is TransLink, so that should be the version we use.


How do you even go about doing a mass edit like that though?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20180711/a9ee1d10/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 17215 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20180711/a9ee1d10/attachment-0001.png>

More information about the Talk-au mailing list