[talk-au] I have written a response to DNRM, please give feedback

Jonathon Rossi jono at jonorossi.com
Mon Mar 12 10:47:52 UTC 2018

Sorry Simon, I really didn't intend to make things more complicated. I just
wanted to ensure someone else doesn't get caught in the future after
thinking I was doing the right thing, and no one else has done this each
time this has come up in the past.

I've made your suggested change to the page in regards to CC BY 4.0
datasets, I've also moved it to the bottom line of the section since that
made sense.

If we don't doubt the validity of the permission granted as you mentioned
we obviously don't know internal government arrangements way back, then
does that mean we'd allow people to continue using the DNRM (and others) CC
BY 2.5 datasets?

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:17 PM Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

> Am 12.03.2018 um 11:13 schrieb Simon Poole:
> Making clear that we don't the validity of the permission granted for the
> CC BY 2.5 datasets, but don't extend it to covering the current ones and
> avoid speculating on internal government arrangements way back.
> That should have been:
> .. that we don't doubt the validity ..
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20180312/b4bc0a71/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-au mailing list