[talk-au] Residential Poolside Building

[Benjamin Ceravolo]

Thanks for that information I will defiantly work on implementing those.

Thanks, Ben.

On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 21:09, Michael Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz> wrote:

> I usually mark all residential buildings, including the main house or
> strata building, as building=residential.  I feel it useful but safe. I
> usually map in Sweden where planning regulations encourage a plethora of
> out-buildings whose use is difficult to judge from imagery: garages, spare
> rooms, wood-sheds, saunas, children's play rooms, yada yada. When I am
> unsure if a building is actually part of a residential plot, then I go for
> building=yes and can check them out on visits.
>
> Mike
> On 2019-08-12 11:46, Benjamin Ceravolo wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been tracing in residential swimming pools and I have not as yet
> found an appropriate tagging for the small poolside buildings that (from my
> experience); may have an area to get changed and to store pool-toys,
> chemicals and other pool care items.
>
> My current guess is just to mark it as: building=yes
>
> If there are any other tags I have missed or if I'm just being blind and
> missing something obvious, I would like to hear your option/response.
>
> Thanks, Ben.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing listTalk-au at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20190812/463a1f9b/attachment.html>