[talk-au] Residential Poolside Building

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Aug 13 05:53:41 UTC 2019


On 13/08/19 10:02, David Wales wrote:
> I mainly do it if I need a break from adding useful data... And it 
> makes the map look pretty.
>
> Also, could it be useful for fire fighters?

It is useful for fire-fighters here, there is even a movement to place 
signs on the street to indicate where they are, just like fire hydrants.
As for 'colouring-in' yes there are vast areas of blankness.
I'd adding farmyards at the moment .. there are 100s of square 
kilometres of them all blank at present. It does at lest give some 
indication that there is not nothing there.
Once I get bored with it I'll go back and add the bits of trees and 
scrub and also homesteads and bits of natural=water (reservoir where I 
can determine it).


>
> On 13 August 2019 9:50:01 am AEST, Andrew Davidson 
> <theswavu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     On 13/8/19 09:22, Ian Sergeant wrote:
>
>         For OSM it's nothing more than a colouring-in exercise. 
>
>
>     Once again it depends on what use you think the data is going to be used
>     for. If you're interested in selling tennis court maintenance services
>     then it's useful information. Maybe you're interested in the spatial
>     distribution of tennis courts and their relationship to polo grounds?
>
>         I agree with Andrew that marking a building next to a private
>         swimming pool as anything other than "building=yes", almost
>         always calls for pure speculation. Whether it's a pool shed,
>         cabana or outside dunny. 
>
>
>     Unless source=survey ....
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20190813/3ece84e8/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list