[talk-au] Our work in last two weeks

Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org
Thu Jan 24 22:34:54 UTC 2019


It sounds like one of those things where opinions are going to vary. Personally I would split them, but I don’t think it’s a big deal to do it one way or the other, and it doesn’t affect the map either way.

Mapping to make some random QA tool happy doesn’t sound tenable to me. Horea (my colleague) shared the OSMCha links mainly because that tool makes it easy to show all changesets of a group of mappers in one place. I think it’s a bit too opinionated when it comes to identifying ‘errors’. But hey, it’s open source software..:)

I’m happy that our work is being scrutinized. Please keep watching our work, we need your feedback to make sure we’re doing everything according to local best practices.

Martijn

> On Jan 23, 2019, at 2:43 PM, Mark Pulley <mrpulley at iinet.net.au> wrote:
> 
> I generally split these ways. A couple of reasons:
> 
> 1. Traffic is generally not meant to make U-turns here. Occasionally there is an explicit no-U-turn sign, but most of the time there is a double white line extending from the end of the median strip preventing turning.
> 
> 2. If a route relation uses the road, then it is required to split the road, as traffic following the relation doesn’t do a U-turn. As an example, have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1284045 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1284045> - ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175260353 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175260353> and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175260354 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175260354> are the respective forward members for each direction of travel. (Probably easier to see in the relation editor in JOSM) 
> 
> Mark P.
> 
>> On 22 Jan 2019, at 8:23 am, Nemanja Bračko <brackone at gmail.com <mailto:brackone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> @Warin,
>> 
>> I personally do not see why is it wrong if you split? It is just two segments merged in one node. Geometry and data are exactly the same just it is represented as two, instead of one line.
>> 
>> If we go deeper in this issue, it is actually wrong, because you have marked/mapped 2 physical segments with just one line. Angle is not natural for any road. However, it doesn't make any difference in routing so it is acceptable to be mapped as one line in cases like this.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Nemanja
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20190124/0b1a9ffb/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-au mailing list