[talk-au] Men's Shed?

[Sam Wilson]

I think it'd take all three keys, if a item needs the further 
clarification of man/woman (although my local is pretty inclusive I 
think, so it's not absolute).

Also, if anyone's in the mood for cataloguing men's sheds, there aren't 
many in Wikidata yet: https://w.wiki/9bA

:-)

On 7/10/19 3:07 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 16:25, Ewen Hill <ewen.hill at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ewen.hill at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>      Exceddingly happy with community.shed as proposed
>
>     On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, 5:15 PM Sam Wilson <sam at samwilson.id.au
>     <mailto:sam at samwilson.id.au>> wrote:
>
>         I think |amenity=community_centre| makes sense, and I think
>         there’s enough in Australia to warrant a specific
>         |community_centre=mens_shed| (or maybe |community_shed|, which
>         Wikipedia suggests as the generic term).
>
> Yes, that has a lot going for it!
>
> Still as community_centre=community_shed?
>
> Or maybe community_shed=man/woman?
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 16:35, Jonathon Rossi <jono at jonorossi.com 
> <mailto:jono at jonorossi.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     I think shed (sometimes) describes the building not that they do.
>     How about community_centre=workshop?
>
>
> No, they're not always located in a "shed", but as that's a pivotal 
> part of the name, I think we should keep reference to it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20191007/c7f7d3bf/attachment.html>