[talk-au] Men's Shed?

[Andrew Harvey]

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 21:03, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/10/19 19:57, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> I added this to the ATG as amenity=community_centre +
> community_centre:for=man,
>
>
> 'man' may mean both men and women. On the other hand it maybe the original
> use was for males only. I think the value is not good.
> There are only 4 uses of the community_centre:for=man in the data base. I
> would prefer a different value... with a clear meaning.
>

Yes, but in this context I think it's pretty please it's for males not
persons. I didn't create that tag, it was already documented at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre:for.

I think we should use Key:community_centre:for rather than Key:gender
because per the wiki "The community_centre:for tag is used to describe the
group of people that is primarily served by the facility, when it is
distinguished by age or gender."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre:for


>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Tagging_Guidelines&type=revision&diff=1856025&oldid=1855758.
> Not saying we need to follow, this if the discussion leads elsewhere it can
> be updated.
>
> To me it seems more like a community centre for men than a club.
> I don't think this warrants it's own tag.
>
> Since there's a wikipedia page, there's a wikidata tag, I wonder if we
> should use operator:wikidata or brand:wikidata to link these all together?
>
> brand rather than operator? I am not certain where the funding comes from,
> some from members contributions.
> I'd think each shed has some control over their operations .. so tagging
> the operator might give the wrong impression?
>

Yes I was leaning more towards brand too.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20191007/b459930e/attachment.html>