[talk-au] Local bicycle routes in NSW

[Andrew Harvey]

For these "routes" though there is no clear A to B, there will be short
segments which are obivously part of a route because there are arrows
directing cyclists, but sometimes these are just short segments to the next
intersection so it's unclear where the route goes from and to, hence why
someone has resorted to just dumping all the segments into one route
relation.

On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 18:56, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>
wrote:

> On 25 Apr 2020, 09:53 +0100, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com>,
> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 18:49, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Relations with type=route are for routes, with a defined start and end.
>> Not
>> for networks. If you want to put them all in a single relation, then do it
>> with type=network or something:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:network
>
>
> Do you have an example of that for cycle networks?
>
>
> I've seen it in the US a few times - can't remember where offhand.
> Ultimately there isn't really a whole lot of point - if you want all the
> routes in Cammeray, just get a bounding box for Cammeray and find the cycle
> routes within it. OSM is a spatial database after all. But people do like
> categorising things!
>
> Richard
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200425/7480e016/attachment.htm>