[talk-au] FW: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:27, Phil Wyatt <phil at wyatt-family.com> wrote:

>
> From: Russell Deffner <russell.deffner at hotosm.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:04 PM
> To: Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com>
> Cc: hot at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,
>
> Just a quick note; HOT does not formally do damage tagging, mainly because
> no tagging schema exists. In the past, members of HOT tried various tagging
> but results for remote damage assessment were poor.
>
> I personally would be glad to see a community driven tagging schema
> developed but if not we (HOT) will need to document what we come up with
> for usage in disaster response and recovery.
>
> One glaring issue has been that typically the tags persist much longer
> than the damage.
>
> =Russ
>
> > On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > It looks like HOT is using the tag 'damage' for something. It is not
> documented as to what it means. Further is this information kept current or
> just added and forgotten? In at least one case the tag goes back to 2011.
>

So it looks like that damage= key we were discussing needs to be
documented, & I suppose go through the full RFC & so on basis for arguments
:-(

However, I'd also suggest that whenever (without fail!), something is
tagged as damaged=, it also has to have a fixme= added, so that it's
(hopefully!) one day corrected.

The big problem there, of course, is when things are marked as damaged by
remote HOT mappers, who is actually on site in that area to correct the map
as buildings are either repaired or demolished, & when is aerial imagery of
these areas likely to be updated?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20200207/755dcea0/attachment.htm>